Project Body Smart | Food labels part 5: Putting it all together


Food labels

Food labels part 5: Putting it all together



In this concluding Part 5, we’ll give you some tips and action steps to ensure you’re getting the most from your food labels.

In Parts 1-4 (click here to review parts 1, 2, 3, and 4) of this food labels article series, we looked at:

  1. whether food labels actually help us be healthier;
  2. whether food labels (especially calorie counts) have meaningful, useful information for us as health-conscious consumers;
  3. how food labels can vary by region and food type;
  4. whether manufacturers are honest and transparent on their food labels; and
  5. what consumers actually do with food labels.

In this concluding Part 5, we’ll give you some tips and action steps to ensure you’re getting the most from your food labels.


Action step 1: Slow down


Take a minute to consider how you’re making buying decisions. Manufacturers depend on consumers being rushed, busy, inattentive, and impulsive.

Put your cell phone down, take 30 seconds to read a package, and focus a few moments longer than normal.

Why is this product in particular worth your money?


Action step 2: Keep it real


One of the PN team members said it best:

“What’s a food label?”

What they meant: They buy whole foods that don’t have labels (except, perhaps, for that annoying little sticker on the produce, which never seems to peel off properly).

If you’re concerned about what’s in your food, stick to whole/unprocessed foods (this will also prevent more food packaging trash from entering the landfill). Eating real food saves you the time and effort of reading labels, and you don’t have any surprises.

If you want to check the nutrient content of a food, use the USDA nutrient database (or another relatively unbiased scientific database that does its own analysis).

Precision Nutrition Food Lbels Part 5 Apple and Label Food labels part 5: Putting it all together

Action step 3: Prioritize ingredients over calories


If a food does have a label, then look at the ingredients list first.  If the ingredients suck, it doesn’t really matter much what the calorie, fat and sugar grams are on the label.

When looking at ingredients, look for short lists of things you recognize. For instance, on a container of oatmeal you should see: Ingredients: oats.

If you can’t pronounce and/or draw the ingredients in a product – there is a good chance you may not want to put it in your body.  Once you are familiar with the products you buy that have labels, you won’t need to check them any more.


Action step 4: Comparison shop


If comparing two similar items, make your choice based on two criteria:

  • more of the stuff you want (e.g., protein and fiber)
  • less of the stuff you don’t want (e.g., sugar and salt).


Other things to look for:


Fair Trade.

Most important for foods that come from warm regions, such as coffee, chocolate, and tropical fruits, since these are likely to be regions where farmers don’t get a fair wage for their labors, or work under safe conditions. It it’s possible to buy Fair Trade, do it.



If it’s possible to buy organic, do it.



Check the country of origin.  If it’s possible to buy local (or closer to home), do it. (Double points if you can buy the food from the person who grew and/or processed it.)



It it’s possible to buy a food without a bunch of extra packaging, do it. Do you really need to put those three apples into a plastic produce bag?


Action step 5: Do it yourself


If you find a product interesting, take a picture of the label.  Then you can go home and figure out how to make it yourself from real ingredients.

This is a great opportunity to be creative and learn a new cooking skill. Plus, you usually save some money making it yourself.


Action step 6: Don’t believe the front of the package


The more a product is trying to convince you it’s healthy or that you should buy it, the more suspicious you should be.  Real food does not have to convince you it’s nutritious. Kale knows it’s all that.


Action step 7: Get beyond the numbers


Don’t worry about things like calories so much. They won’t help you as much as you expect.

If you want to get healthier and leaner, move beyond calorie counting.  Recognize that even “unbiased” numbers may not be 100% precise or useful.


Action step 8: Use common sense


If a food says “heart-healthy” and this appeals to you… turn the package over and check out the ingredients. Does the ingredient list match the “heart-healthy” claim?


Action step 9: Set your deal-breakers and “minimums”


Establish your baseline. What makes food a no-go for you?

If your deal-breakers are on the food label, you don’t eat that food.  Some ideas from the PN team include::

  1. Hydrogenated/partially hydrogenated oils (source of trans fats)
  2. High fructose corn syrup (not necessarily because it’s handled much differently than other sugars, but it usually indicates a non-nutritious food)
  3. Added sugars (including hidden sources like syrups)
  4. Artificial colors (example: FD&C Blue #1)
  5. Canned items not labeled BPA free
  6. Atlantic or farmed salmon (instead of wild caught)
  7. Products from China (which has recently been busted for many food safety violations, such as melamine in baby formula and heavy metals in various foods and herbal preparations)
  8. Animal ingredients
  9. Gluten
  10. Non-organic
  11. Nitrates/nitrites
  12. High sodium


Obviously, you can choose the “baseline” and “deal-breakers” that suit you, your nutritional level, and your own needs.

No matter what you decide, what’s most important is that you are in charge of your food choices.

As a consumer and “food fighter”, YOU have the power – and now, the knowledge – to make healthy choices.

Use that power wisely.





ntonuk Beth & Block LG. The Effect of Single Serving Versus Entire Package Nutritional Information on Consumption Norms and Actual Consumption of a Snack Food. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006;38:365-370

AP News Service. Heart Association to endorse some foods. June 28, 1988.

Bes-Rastrollo M, et al.  Nut consumption and weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: The SUN study.  Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:107-116.

Bes-Rastrollo M, et al.  Prospective study of nut consumption, long-term weight change, and obesity risk in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1913-1919.

Bialik C.  New studies eat into diet math.  Wall Street Journal.  April 2, 2010.   

Brody JE. Still counting calories?  Your weight-loss plan may be outdated.  NY Times.  July 18th, 2011.  

Byrd-Bredbenner C, et al. The nutrition label knowledge and usage behaviours of women in the US. Nutrition Bulletin. 2000;25:315-322.

Crum AJ, et al. Mind over milkshakes: mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychol.2011;30:424-429.

Dhingra R, et al.  Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community.  Circulation. 2007;116:480-488.

Drichoutis AC, et al. A theoretical and empirical investigation of nutritional label use. Eur J Health Econ. 2008;9:293–304.

Duffey KJ & Popkin BM. Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977-2006. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001050.

Dunbar G. Research report: Task-based nutrition labelling. Appetite. 2010;55:431–435.

Evenepoel P, et al.  Digestibility of cooked and raw egg protein in humans as assessed by stable isotope techniques. J Nutr. 1998;128:1716-1722.

Fooducate. 1862 – 2011: A brief history of food and nutrition labeling.

Fooducate. The Problematic Problem of Nutritionism.

Gorton D, et al. Nutrition labels: a survey of use, understanding and preferences among ethnically diverse shoppers in New Zealand. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12:1359–1365.

Jones G & Richardson M. An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements. Public Health Nutr. 2007;10:238–244.

Kim WK & Kim J. A study on the consumer’s perception of front-of-pack nutrition labeling. Nutr Res Pract. 2009;3:300-306.

Kümpel Nørgaard M & Brunsøa K. Families’ use of nutritional information on food labels. Food Quality and Preference. 2009;20:597-606.

Lin CT, et al. Do dietary intakes affect search for nutrient information on food labels? Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1955–1967.

Livesey G. A perspective on food energy standards for nutrition labeling. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:271-287.

Livesey G. Energy values of unavailable carbohydrate and diets: an inquiry and analysis.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1990;51:617-637.

Louie JC, et al. A comparison of two nutrition signposting systems for use in Australia. NSW Public Health Bull. 2008;19:121-126.

Martinez-Gonzalez MA & Bes-Rastrollo M.  Nut consumption, weight gain and obesity: Epidemiological evidence.  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;21 Suppl 1:S40-S45.

Mattes RD & Dreher ML.  Nuts and healthy body weight maintenance mechanisms.  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010;19:137-141.

Melnick M.  Nobody orders fast-food salads, but that’s not the real problem.  Time Magazine.

Mozaffarian D & Ludwig DS.  Dietary guidelines in the 21st century – a time for food.  JAMA. 2010;304:681-682.

Mozaffarian D, et al.  Changes in diet and lifestyle and long-term weight gain in women and men. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2392-2404.

Murakami K, et al.  Hardness (difficulty of chewing) of the habitual diet in relation to body mass index and waist circumference in free-living Japanese women aged 18-22 y.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86:206-213.

MSNBC.  No calories, same taste (and heart risks).  Accessed August 30, 2011.

Nørgaard MK & Brunsø K. Families’ use of nutritional information on food labels. Food Quality and Preference. 2009;20:597–606.

Ogden CL & Carroll MD. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Extreme Obesity Among Adults: United States, Trends 1960–1962 Through 2007–2008. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.

Oka K, et al.  Food texture differences affect energy metabolism in rats.  J Dent Res. 2003;82:491-494.

Popkin BM & Duffey KJ. Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1342-1347.

Roodenburg ACJ, et al. Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the International Choices Programme. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65:1190–1200.

Sacks G, et al. Impact of front-of-pack ‘traffic-light’ nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promotion International. 2009;24:344-352.

Sharma LL, et al. The Food Industry and Self-Regulation: Standards to Promote Success and to Avoid Public Health Failures. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:240–246.

Thiel R. The truth about vitamins in supplements. American Naturopathic Medicine Monitor. 2003;6:2.

Trivedi B. The calorie delusion: Why food labels are wrong. New Scientist. Issue 2717. 2009.

United States Congress. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990

United States Food and Drug Administration (USDA). Consumer Information: Food Labels. How to Understand and Use the Nutrition Facts Label.

United States Food and Drug Administration (USDA). Open Letter to Industry from Dr. Hamburg.
March 3, 2010.

United States Food and Drug Administration (USDA). Guidance for Industry: Dear Manufacturer Letter Regarding Front-of-Package Symbols. December 2008.

Urban LE, et al. The accuracy of stated energy contents of reduced-energy, commercially prepared foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110:116-123.

Urban LE, et al.  Accuracy of stated energy contents of restaurant foods. JAMA. 2011;306:287-293.

Vyth EL, et al. Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice. Public Health Nutrition. 2010;13:1882-1889.

Whole Foods. Top 10 ANDI Scores.

Wills JM, et al. Exploring global consumer attitudes toward nutrition information on food labels. Nutr Rev. 2009;67(Suppl. 1):S102–S106


TAGS > , , , , ,

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.